06/27/2026
Entire blog as a free PDF eBook.
Yesterday, an article was published on tkp.at that refutes the theory that the coronavirus originated in a laboratory: Facts against the lab theory. Source.
The “lab theory” is being revived, claiming that a dangerous virus escaped from Wuhan. But this theory overlooks the political Covid maneuvering – masks, injections, lockdowns – and even legitimizes it. Eight facts against the lab theory.
While the world blindly debates “mutants,” leading academics Igor Khmelinskii and Peter Stallinga (University of the Algarve, Portugal), together with Leslie V. Woodcock, have forensically dissected the foundations of the “pandemic.”
Their explosive study (peer-reviewed in 2024) proves in black and white what our NEXT LEVEL investigations have long revealed: The alleged “virus” is purely a computer construct. It has never been physically isolated or actually detected. Source: Telegram, April 11, 2026, 8:44 p.m.
Why do I reject claims that a fabricated virus causing a fabricated disease escaped from a biological weapons laboratory that is certainly authentic but not particularly well-secured? The reason is simple: Because no scientific evidence has yet been presented for the pathogenic nature of the entity commonly referred to as a virus. As I wrote recently, no credible theory regarding the spread of infectious diseases has been found either.
So what are these laboratories working on if their scientists know that a disease cannot be triggered by a modified or unmodified substance containing an RNA ribonucleotide structure? I do not know, because this is a military secret that is better protected than these “indiscretions” in the media.
There is currently no “awakening process” taking place in the media, but rather an unprecedented, planned diversionary tactic. Everyone is publishing at the same time. This raises the following questions:
- Is this meant to distract from the fact that the question of the virus’s existence is attracting more and more attention?
- Is this meant to distract from the fact that more and more people are asking questions about the vaccine’s toxicity?
- Is this intended to introduce a new narrative? For example: “Viruses from the lab exist and are even more dangerous”?
- Why is this happening right now—during the World Cup?
For those who are skeptical of the criticism directed at the aggressively promoted belief in viruses, I recommend reading the following articles: Is Virology a Science?, Unscientific “Science.”
That doesn’t worry me, because I have a stash of slightly used, six-year-old masks in my jacket pockets.
Three images—the same structures, but with different captions, used in different ways:
Author of the article: Marek Wojcik
Email: worldscam3@gmail.com
<If you like what I write, it would help a lot to further spread these articles if you share them with your friends on social media.