06/23/2026
Entire blog as a free PDF eBook.
When you research nexiqa.com, which identifies itself as the “most critical AI,” presumably because it simply prioritizes information differently than mainstream AIs, Google labels it as “controversial.” It claims to have spread medical misinformation, deny the existence of viruses, and be vaccine-skeptical. This reminded me that such classifications have been made for centuries whenever someone makes a seemingly “outrageous” observation.
The article published on Sunday on tkp.at began with this introduction: When one AI labels another as “unreliable.” Source.
Let’s play around a bit with this machine-generated pseudo-intelligence. I’m not highlighting the AI’s response with a citation color, since the source of this knowledge is a database.
Question: Who defines disinformation?
AI: Disinformation is primarily defined by European Union institutions, governments, international organizations (e.g., NATO), and academic circles. There is no uniform legal definition, but it is generally recognized as the intentional creation and dissemination of false or misleading information to manipulate, exert influence, or gain advantages.
In 2023, the World Economic Forum (WEF) announced that it had recruited hundreds of thousands of “information warriors” to control the internet and monitor social media platforms and forums for “disinformation” and conspiracy theory content, which would then be systematically shut down. According to Klaus Schwab of the WEF, disinformation on the internet is a “life-threatening” “infodemic” that requires “treatment.”
The WEF’s definition of disinformation encompasses all online content with which the WEF disagrees. This means that hundreds of thousands of WEF information warriors will be tasked with silencing opposition to the globalist elite.
This gang of oligarchs has enough money to buy off almost any politician. Those who oppose them are simply eliminated. This fate befell, for example, their former ally Charlie Kirk on September 10, 2025. Many believe that the Mossad was behind this assassination. He died in the common interest and presumably in collaboration with the globalists. I have no evidence for this—it is merely a logical conclusion based on past experience with the activities of these criminal organizations.
Although the term “artificial intelligence” captures only the first part of reality, I am not opposed to the development of this technology. Rapid access to a massive database—largely tailored to the official narrative—and its computer-assisted processing cannot be described as intelligence.
Hardly anyone will be able to guess which side the ant will take to avoid the water droplet on its path. And that’s probably a good thing, because even the AI isn’t able to predict this. AI: The ant will go around the water droplet from either side (left or right), depending on the terrain and chance. Here, the answer level corresponds to the question.
An example where AI helps create an image that shows the empathy of the U.S. president:
Author of the article: Marek Wojcik
Email: worldscam3@gmail.com
<If you like what I write, it would help a lot to further spread these articles if you share them with your friends on social media.