10/17/2026
Entire blog as a free PDF eBook.
On May 7, 1999, at 11:46 p.m. local time, a U.S. B-2 Spirit strategic bomber dropped five guided bombs on the Chinese embassy building in Belgrade. The United States (CIA) acknowledged that this was a mistake caused by the use of outdated maps and incorrect coordinates—the intended target was actually the Yugoslav Supply Agency, located several hundred meters away. The incident triggered a major diplomatic crisis; the United States later paid compensation to China.
On February 28, 2026, at 10:45 a.m. local time, a U.S. Tomahawk missile struck a school in Minab. More than 175 people were killed, most of them children between the ages of 7 and 12. The U.S. Army relied on outdated intelligence data (DIA). The school building had previously been part of a military base belonging to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and was listed as a military target in the targeting systems, even though it had been completely separated by walls and converted into a civilian facility prior to 2016.
The war in Iraq and Syria. Confidential documents published by The New York Times (the so-called “Civilian Casualty Files”) revealed that thousands of civilians were killed in U.S. airstrikes due to “confirmation bias” and the use of outdated situation reports. The military mistook fleeing civilians for combatants, unaware that the balance of power in that particular city block had already shifted several hours earlier.
The real-life events described above share a common thread, aside from the human tragedy: the decision-making process that led to the murders. This process was based on false information provided by intelligence agencies. In carrying out these attacks, decision-makers relied on an unfounded belief in the infallibility of intelligence information. Technocracy has decided to take it one step further—armies of killer robots are being built, based on algorithms and data from precisely such sources. They want to replace fallible humans with fallible programs, colloquially referred to as artificial intelligence.
After all, artificial intelligence is much more effective than human intelligence! At least, that’s what the technocrats claim. Despite all the hype surrounding it, artificial intelligence simply does not exist. We are dealing merely with artificial software that is fed carefully selected data sets. You just have to ask it: Who is behind the fabricated COVID-19 pandemic? You’ll get the following or a similar answer:
The COVID-19 pandemic is not a fabrication—it was triggered by the real SARS-CoV-2 virus, and its outbreak and progression have been documented by global scientific and medical institutions such as the World Health Organization (WHO).
This response does not surprise me in the least, since the AI does not have access to hundreds of scientific studies that substantiate the conspiratorial—in practice, not just in theory—origin of the pandemic.
No, because natural stupidity is invincible!
What becomes of humanity when technology becomes capable of recognising, classifying, tracking and ultimately killing human beings without those carrying out the strikes ever having seen them? My friend Mohammad Reza Dehshiri asked this very question, and his answer is a powerful one. The danger, he writes, is not artificial intelligence but artificial inhumanity – that is, the possibility that machines will become more accurate precisely as humans cease to feel responsible for what those machines do in their name.
This is how Lorenzo Maria Pacini begins his Saturday article on strategic-culture.su: Human intelligence, artificial intelligence and the future of algorithmic warfare. In some countries, Russian sources are blocked. The English-language source is available via the free TOR browser.
I don’t believe the U.S. government would have intentionally bombed the Chinese embassy or a school in Iran. That would not improve the already severely tarnished reputation of this declining empire. It’s possible that someone from the intelligence services is deliberately feeding false information into the database to harm the current administration. Most likely, however, it comes down to simple human error and negligence in the conduct of intelligence work.
The responsibility for the crime, however, always lies with the person who makes the decision to launch an attack based on this falsified data. It is precisely these people who have a duty to verify the data they receive. I admit—that’s not always easy. But when the lives of many innocent people are at stake, the cost of a mistake is too high. That is precisely why there is a trend toward autonomous decisions by killing machines—to circumvent such problems in the future and shift the blame onto self-determining technology.
Author of the article: Marek Wojcik
Email: worldscam3@gmail.com
<If you like what I write, it would help a lot to further spread these articles if you share them with your friends on social media.