1355. Decades of Lies About Space
1355. Decades of Lies About Space

1355. Decades of Lies About Space

09/12/2026

Entire blog as a free PDF eBook.

Today’s headline follows up on yesterday’s article: A Quarter-Century of Terror Through Lies. Our deceitful world encompasses virtually every aspect of life. I’m not going to espouse any “Matrix” theories here, even though that is one possible explanation for the paranoia of our times. For example, the history we learned in school is merely an interpretation of events, mostly from the perspective of the propaganda of a series of successive victors.

Let’s assume, for the sake of argument, that Germany had won World War II. Who would we today, without hesitation, call the greatest monster of the 20th century? Certainly not the painter with the mustache. His place would be taken by an equally mustachioed rival from Georgia. After all, in the East there was the Gulag Archipelago, and Auschwitz was merely a place for the rehabilitation of lost sheep. History—as we know it—is a matter of interpretation.

What about the historical facts? Nothing special, since all facts can always be interpreted accordingly. That’s why we have the Goebbels of our time—masters of propaganda who exploit mass psychology.

A “historical fact” and its interpretation:
Archaeologists found a Nokia 1. The battery was still 20% charged!

Instead of clarifying the controversies surrounding the moon landing and presenting the relevant documents, they are dismissed just like historical doubts. The film footage of the Apollo missions has disappeared, which fuels the imagination of skeptics like me even more.

According to contemporary science a falling or thrown object follows a trajectory determined by gravity. The Apollo footage therefore potentially provides something much more valuable than visual impressions. It provides data. If the footage is genuine, researchers should be able to take an object whose dimensions are known, track its movement frame by frame, establish the elapsed time, and calculate its acceleration. Excerpt from an article published Thursday on globalresearch.ca: Apollo Footage: Lunar Gravity — or Slow Motion?

According to contempory physics and the theory of gravity the Moon’s gravity is puportedly approximately one-sixth that of Earth’s. That means objects falling or being thrown into the air should follow trajectories that are measurably different from those produced under terrestrial gravity.

Surely there will be some who take issue with the author’s use of the word “air” when describing the situation on the Moon. Considering that, according to the author, these materials originated on Earth, this reaction does not surprise me.

Why has it not been possible for many decades to repeat the great success of the Apollo missions? Because the cost of maintaining the space lies has led to a catastrophic situation in the U.S. dollar market.

Author of the article: Marek Wojcik
Email: worldscam3@gmail.com

<If you like what I write, it would help a lot to further spread these articles if you share them with your friends on social media.

Leave a Reply