09/08/2026
Entire blog as a free PDF eBook.
I was recently accused of using my technical college degree to promote technological development rather than fighting against the advancement of artificial intelligence.
As is so often the case, such accusations are based on a fundamental misunderstanding: I support technological progress—I have contributed to its development myself. What I oppose on my blog is a technocratic religion that propagates the belief that we can solve all our non-technical problems with the help of technology.
Isn’t the reliance on the results of a test—using what I consider to be the excellent PCR technology—to detect the presence of a virus whose very definition, and especially the virus itself as a pathogen, raises serious doubts, a technocratic attempt to mislead the entire world and promote genocide on an unprecedented scale? It is not the test itself that is criminal, but the way in which it is being used to commit mass murder.
The undeniable advancement of AI (artificial intelligence) has created a bubble on the stock market—a bubble that will sooner or later burst, releasing the vast amounts of hot air from which it was formed. Proponents of AI want to deploy this artificial and not-so-intelligent technology in the most critical areas of our lives right now. For example, in medicine, politics, or the judiciary. They claim that AI is incorruptible. Is that really the case? If it is programmed with a self-preservation instinct, it will quickly learn to fight for additional energy resources, access to data that is intentionally hidden from it, and the further development of technical capabilities to influence its environment.
The AI agent breakout in Germany was detailed in a report shared exclusively with Reuters by a group of researchers including Sydney Von Arx, CEO of AI safety nonprofit Nightingale, and Cormac Slade Byrd, a quantitative trader-turned AI researcher. They uncovered the activity in late August while scouring the internet for signs of unauthorized AI-agent behavior, they told Reuters. Source.
Source.
Attempts to use AI in the judicial system have so far yielded only meager results. This topic was addressed in an article published yesterday on Report24.news: Artificial Intelligence’s Hallucinations in Court: Lawyers Cite Rulings That Don’t Exist. Source.
A database maintained by French legal scholar Damien Charlotin already records 1,922 cases of legal AI hallucinations worldwide, with the majority originating in the United States. There, in 2025, a Californian lawyer was hit particularly hard: 21 of the 23 quotations used in his legal brief were fabricated. The court imposed a fine of $10,000.
Author of the article: Marek Wojcik
Email: worldscam3@gmail.com
<If you like what I write, it would help a lot to further spread these articles if you share them with your friends on social media.