1324. The Myth of Fossil Fuels

08/10/2026

Entire blog as a free PDF eBook.

Must it always be the case that a scientific theory emerges that, despite a lack of evidence, becomes the accepted norm for a “scientific” approach to a phenomenon? Such dogmas are more reminiscent of religion than of a truly scientific approach to phenomena in physics and the life sciences. Incidentally, science is pitted against religion, even though they are two areas of humanity’s search for the truth about life that are by no means mutually exclusive.

Virology is based on the never-proven assumption that what it calls a “virus” is the cause—and not the consequence—of diseases. The “evidence” presented is based on mental constructs and has never been tested against reality in accordance with scientific rules. It is precisely these rules that are being altered in order to remain in an unscientific world full of false and unfounded claims propagated by the media.

Darwin’s theory of evolution, even though it is still referred to as a theory, has long been recognized as fact by science. I, too, would agree that for some philanthropists, an ape-like ancestry would even make sense.

At this point, it is worth addressing another form of pseudoscience, whose leading figure is the world’s foremost vaccine researcher introduced above. For over 200 years, relentless propaganda has been proclaiming the superiority of vaccines over human health and human life. This superiority consists of eliminating potentially sick people through effective propaganda, which in turn leads to the mass consumption of agents of biological warfare—that is, to voluntary euthanasia.

Imagine you’re sitting in a packed lecture hall. The professor of petroleum geology draws a picture on the blackboard: 150 million years ago, dead plankton sank to the seabed, was buried by sediment, transformed into kerogen under pressure and heat, and finally cracked into petroleum. “Fossil fuel,” he says. “At last.” The students take notes. No one asks any questions.

This is an excerpt from an article published today on tkp.at: Fossil fuels? The biogenic theory scientifically at an end – Part 1. Source.

The professor forgot to mention that what he just said contradicts the second law of thermodynamics. How does science deal with such contradictions?

This can be clearly illustrated by the example of the defense of the geocentric theory (according to which the Earth was the center of the universe), in which all anomalies in planetary motion were explained by Ptolemy, who modeled the complex and variable motions of the planets (including their retrograde motion) using smaller circles (epicycles) moving on larger circles (deferents). For over a thousand years, right up to the time of Copernicus, this model allowed for satisfactory predictions of the positions of celestial bodies in the sky.

Even more nonsensical is the distinction between “bad” and “good” cholesterol. All of this serves only to prolong the life of this pseudoscientific lie at the expense of human lives. And how could we solve this problem? I think the “kangaroo method” is extremely effective.

Author of the article: Marek Wojcik
Email: worldscam3@gmail.com

<If you like what I write, it would help a lot to further spread these articles if you share them with your friends on social media.