09/07/2026
Entire blog as a free PDF eBook.
The complex geopolitical situation fosters the emergence of false political notions of two opposing blocs modeled on the Cold War. In a world where two motives dominate political action—power and money—such black-and-white thinking is inevitably flawed. Added to this is the artificially stoked hatred toward certain peoples—today, above all, Russians and Jews—which often serves as a highly emotional argument in pseudo-political debates.
The division into blocs—unipolar and multipolar—is merely a theoretical construct developed for the purposes of political science to categorize the extremely confusing picture of today’s world and bring a certain order to it. Much like the division between left and right, this is merely a classification and serves precisely that purpose.
Of course, there are Western countries that are losing strength year after year, and BRICS countries that are gaining strength. But this kind of simplistic thinking is very superficial. A good example of this is today’s article by Andrew Korybko: Why Won’t China Cut Ukraine Off From Drone-Related Sales?
Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL) referenced the EU’s summertime disbursement of the first €1 billion to Ukraine for drone procurement out of the €6 billion promised for this program in an article late last month about how “Ukraine’s Drone War Exposes An Uncomfortable Reliance On China”. They drew attention to the carve-out allowing Ukraine to purchase Chinese parts with these funds, ergo the politically incorrect observation back then that “The EU Plans To Pay China To Help Ukraine Kill Russians”.
Source.
Come on, be reasonable! After all, China is undoubtedly providing political support to Russia in this conflict. So why is it supplying components for lethal drones to Ukraine? China justifies this with “active neutrality”—that is, the arms trade, in which both sides of the conflict are supplied with military goods. That has just as much to do with neutrality as comparing a chair to an electric chair—you can sit on both.
One could argue that the interests associated with the arms trade bring so many benefits that China made precisely this decision. That may be true to a certain extent, but it’s not the only reason. The globalists’ interest in prolonging the war in Ukraine aligns with China’s economic interests—as Andrew Korybko has described in this article.
Source: Telegram, September 4, 2026, 9:32 a.m.
In the past, such innovations came from Europe, and now that the unelected “elites” are driving all of Europe into ruin, we’re falling behind in innovative technologies, too!
The rivalry between the United States-China has taken a new turn as both superpowers are allegedly developing “hunter” weaponry. This weaponry is highly sophisticated and spans satellites, unmanned spaceplanes and orbital weaponry. According to a report by Reuters, both nations are actively transitioning their security infrastructure from passive to active. These weapons are capable of aggressive defense in the event of direct orbital engagement. Source.
In Poland, a highly advanced drone technology has spontaneously emerged based on an early-warning system.
Author of the article: Marek Wojcik
Email: worldscam3@gmail.com
<If you like what I write, it would help a lot to further spread these articles if you share them with your friends on social media.