12/01/2025
Entire blog as a free PDF eBook.
Euthanasia must be an essential instrument of our future societies, in all cases. Of course, we won’t be able to execute people or organize camps. We will get rid of them by making them believe it’s for their own good.
Who said this? It wasn’t Bill Gates or Klaus Schwab. Nor did George Soros write these words. They were uttered in the same year that Microsoft introduced its first 8-bit operating system, MS-DOS.
Jacques Attali, an advisor to former French President François Mitterrand, wrote in 1981: In the future, it will be about finding a way to reduce the population. We will start with the elderly, because once a person is over 60 or 65, they live longer than they produce, and that costs society dearly. Then the weak, and then the useless, who contribute nothing to society because their numbers are constantly growing, and finally, and above all, the stupid. Euthanasia is aimed at these groups.
You can turn on English subtitles or read the transcript below.
An excessively large and largely unnecessary population is something that is too costly for society. It is also far better for the human machine, from a societal perspective, if it ceases abruptly rather than gradually deteriorating. We will not be able to pass intelligence tests on millions upon millions of people.
You can imagine. We will find something or create something. A pandemic that targets certain people, a genuine economic crisis or not, a virus that affects the elderly—it doesn’t matter.
The weak and the fearful will succumb. The foolish will believe it and beg to be treated. We will have ensured that the treatment is planned. A treatment that will be the solution. The selection of the idiots will thus take care of itself. They will go to the slaughter alone.
It couldn’t be clearer. And there are already the people they want to get rid of, the elderly. Basically, this coincides with the people who are now… I mean, the prioritization of vaccinations. First the elderly, then now the disabled are getting Johnson & Johnson products, and that’s the kind of thing people say. They’re supposed to offer it to the homeless, and so on.
At this point, I’d like to emphasize the following: This excerpt is from the book A Short History of the Future, published in 2006 in the magazine “Franka.” Jacques Attelier is a French economist and founder of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
Anyone who still believes that no reasonable person would advocate for depopulation belongs to those who would willingly die – naturally, only to make all of humanity happy. Our “overpopulated” planet can barely support 59 people per square kilometer – the average global population density. Admittedly, this figure is skewed. There are uninhabited high mountain regions, deserts, and polar areas to consider. Nevertheless, we have sufficient energy resources to feed up to 20 billion people and meet their basic needs.
Euthanasia is a deliberately manipulated theory, similar to the climate change hoax, that serves the interests of a few billionaires. A new study published in the “Journal of Death and Dying” sounds the alarm: Canada could save $1.2 trillion in healthcare costs between 2027 and 2047 by euthanizing 14.7 million people instead of providing them with palliative care.
This includes nine million elderly people, four million people with mental illness or suicidal tendencies, 300,000 Indigenous people, people with addictions, and the homeless. This would represent almost 40% of the population. The study even examines a scenario of involuntary euthanasia. Critics openly refer to this as a state-sanctioned eugenics program. The numbers are already rising rapidly: In 2024, almost 10,000 people died through euthanasia—a 10% increase compared to the previous year.
Author of the article: Marek Wojcik
Email: worldscam3@gmail.com
<If you like what I write, it would help a lot to further spread these articles if you share them with your friends on social media.