41. Class action
41. Class action

41. Class action

Vienna 10/9/2020

Entire blog as a PDF eBook.

My previous belief was that the German people are among the most obedient peoples.
The story of the Nazis’ rise to power in the 1930s made a compelling argument for me.
How easy it is to get confused by such generalizing judgments!

Today the German community is most active worldwide in the movement to defend freedom and to find the truth. It is the Germans who tirelessly repeat over and over again, we cannot repeat the mistake of this dark story.

Probably only a few people know that an extra-parliamentary corona investigation committee was set up in Germany in July of this year.

The commission heard from many experts.
The commission consists of doctors, journalists and four lawyers.
This committee works among others Dr. Reiner Füllmich. He is a lawyer in Germany and California, USA. Source.

Actions for damages.

A class action lawsuit against three people is about to open in the US:

  1. Prof. Dr. Christian Drosten – virologist at the Charité hospital in Berlin. He was an advisor to the federal government during the swine flu season and is now also the main expert on whose advice the Angela Merkel Chancellors are based. Both 10 years ago during the swine flu and now, he is the author of apocalyptic predictions of a pandemic.
    He is the inventor of the PCR test, whose or imitations are used worldwide without justification to diagnose COVID-19 patients.
  2. Prof. Dr. Lothar H. Wieler – Head of the RKI at the Robert Koch Institute in Berlin. He banned the autopsy of coronavirus victims. He is also an advisor to the federal government.
  3. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus – Head of WHO. In March, he declared a pandemic for no scientific reason and recommended the use of a PCR test, which has yet to be tested and approved.



The lawsuit is based on false claims that this test is sufficient evidence of coronavirus infection.The PCR test is used worldwide and the results are mostly incorrect.
There is ample evidence that this test is not suitable for diagnostic purposes. However, there is no evidence that this test can be used to diagnose infections in patients.

Preparations for the trial are underway. In the first step, access a US court on the knowledge of the class action.

Author: Marek Wojcik

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

code