152. Science and “Vaccination”
152. Science and “Vaccination”

152. Science and “Vaccination”

Vienna 12/12/2021

Entire blog as a PDF eBook.

Originally I wanted to write about yesterday’s mass demonstration in Vienna.

On December 5, FrenchDailyNews published an article in English in which 60,000 scientists called for an end to mass vaccination.

Mass vaccination with a still experimental messenger RNA vaccine has long worried the scientific community. As of October 4, 2020, three high-level scientists:

  • Prof. Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard University, biostatistician and epidemiologist, specializing in the detection and monitoring of infectious disease outbreaks and in the evaluation of vaccine safety,
  • Dr. Sunetra Gupta, professor at Oxford University, an epidemiologist specializing in immunology, vaccine development and mathematical modeling of infectious diseases,
  • Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, a professor at Stanford University School of Medicine, a physician, epidemiologist, health economist, and public health policy expert specializing in infectious diseases and vulnerable populations

recommended an alternative approach to Covid-19 in what was called the Great Barrington Declaration. Because they are very concerned about the side effects of mass vaccination on populations.

What do they advocate? A “focused” protection. That is to say, to protect as much as possible the elderly, the infirm, the frail and to leave the others to live normally until the society reaches the collective immunity. However, mass vaccination by mRNA makes this collective immunity impossible.

One of the original co-signatories was Dr. Simon Thornley, an epidemiologist and biostatistician at the University of Auckland. The Great Barrington Declaration has since been signed by 60,000 physicians and scientists and is becoming increasingly well known around the world. A petition has so far gathered 870,000 signatures of support.

You can also sign this declaration.

As you can see, many doctors disagree with the global policy of unilateral flu vaccination or some variant of it. Doctors, especially scientists, have a hard time making public statements that do not support this massive propaganda.

Doctors are deprived of their professional rights, scientists are dependent on research projects, which in turn are decided by politicians. There are also media smear campaigns against disobedient scientists. Such scientists can only speak in independent media. They become Orwellian unpersons in the official media.

Author of the article: Marek Wojcik

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.