08/17/2025
Entire blog as a free PDF eBook.
The dangerous mission of wiretapping conversations in Anchorage is over. It’s high time to hit the not-so-red carpet in the Oval Office on Monday.
However, today’s article is not about president of Ukraine. He is a puppet who hangs on the strings of the globalists. As are most of the EU’s “statesmen”. Today we will look at the organizations behind these subversives of the global order. It was a strange order based on missiles and bombs, but the one they are preparing for us doesn’t seem any better.
…in 1851 New York Herald Tribune, under the sponsorship and publishing of Horace Greeley, employed as its London correspondent an obscure journalist by the name of Karl Marx. We are told that foreign correspondent Marx, stone broke, and with a family ill and undernourished, constantly appealed to Greeley and Managing Editor Charles Dana for an increase in his munificent salary of $5 per installment, a salary which he and Engels ungratefully labeled as the “lousiest petty bourgeois cheating.”
…
The very word “secrecy” is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment.
Before I name the author of the above statement, I would like to point out the topicality of the content it addresses. The first part of the quote, which refers to Marx and Engels, has ended up here because it caught my attention due to the way it was argued. I am not a supporter of the Marxist theory of class struggle, I think it is greatly exaggerated. On the other hand, the claim that he had a sick and undernourished family does not seem to me to be a convincing argument against scientific socialism.
The gray everyday life in a country supposedly ruled by the proletariat and the unsuccessful attempts to implement this sick theory have clearly proven its futility. We had a much healthier and more empathetic society during the communist era? Certainly, but that was no credit to Karl Marx and his theory.
The excerpts quoted above are from John F. Kennedy’s speech, President and the Press, which he gave on April 27, 1961. That was 64 years ago and is still relevant today. The war in Ukraine will not end as long as the forces that planned and brought about this war are still at work. You can call them the Deep State, the globalists, the swamp, the beast or whatever you like. It doesn’t change the fact that most of the puppets, called politicians for the sake of camouflage, are subject to them.
Various pigeonholes have been invented to facilitate orientation in this chaos of political directions. Left, right – what’s the difference? This now artificial division is the best example of the occupational therapy that most of us engage in practically every day. Both the left with the right and the Zionists with their critics are not black or white. There is no such thing as a bad person or a good person. There is always a mixture, and which pigeonhole we put him or her in depends entirely on us – the judges.
This proves how dangerous the media are.
The vast majority of readers of this blog are probably of the opinion that Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu is an evil person, a criminal. That is also my opinion. But does an Israeli whose child was killed on a bus by a suicide bombing by a Palestinian terrorist think the same? I very much doubt it.
If you don’t want to bother with politics – which is understandable in today’s world – I have a suggestion for you as to who you should vote for in the next election. Pay attention to who is criticized the most on TV and other mainstream media – that will be your candidate.
Author of the article: Marek Wojcik
Email: worldscam3@gmail.com
<If you like what I write, it would help a lot to further spread these articles if you share them with your friends on social media.