Ostrzeszów/Poland 06/01/2025
Entire blog as a free PDF eBook.
Can artificial intelligence be used as a world government? I asked this question in German to artificial intelligence (AI) today on Chatgtp 4.0. This was the answer that came:
The idea of using AI as a world government raises numerous ethical, technical and social questions. In theory, AI could be used to analyse large amounts of data, make decisions and optimize resources. However, there are also many challenges:
- Ethics and morals: AI systems are based on algorithms that may not be able to fully grasp human values and ethical principles. There is a risk that decisions made by AI may not be in the best interests of all people;
- Transparency: The decision-making processes of AI are often opaque. It would be difficult to understand how and why certain decisions are made;
- Control: Who controls the AI? It is important to define clear responsibilities to ensure that the technology is not misused;
- Diversity of opinions: An AI might have difficulties taking the diversity of human opinions and cultures adequately into account;
- Technological dependence: Too much dependence on AI could restrict human freedom of choice and creativity.
Overall, AI could have a supportive effect in certain areas of governance, but it is not suitable as a complete world government due to the challenges mentioned.
I would say – quite a sensible answer. Because that’s exactly what it should be. Gone are the days when some people received chilling texts about the superiority of machines over humans. Back then, chaos was sown in our psyche – now is the phase where we should gain our trust in AI.
Please note point 3 in the argument above, as it is the prime example of the potential dangers. Today, the control of AI is in the hands of digital technology giants such as Google or BlackRock’s Aladdin database.
Technocracy expert, Patrick Wood, considers the latest technological developments as extremely dangerous for all of humanity. He sheds light on weighty and controversial questions like: Is it possible to make controversial mRNA injections mandatory based on an AI cancer prognosis for the future? Or as in the example of Starlink initiator Elon Musk, where are we heading when such enormous power lies in the hands of a single individual? Patrick Wood calls for a confrontation with AI and other technologies because they are threatening our personal freedom. With an easy-to-adopt solution proposal, he encourages everyone to lead by example. Source.
I suspect that Elon Musk’s supporters will make an outcry after seeing this interview. I too believe that this billionaire’s stance on free speech is an invaluable contribution to the fight against the deep state. This is by no means to say that his neuralink does not also pose a threat. What if it is for the good of humanity? It’s possible that these are Musk’s intentions. But what happens when people with a well below average cruelty threshold – ruthless technocrats – take control of these projects?
I really like the trend towards paying cash. When I increasingly see the sign at the checkout: “Cash only”, my heart rejoices.
I’m not going to justify again that cash is uncontrollable. I don’t care if someone knows how much gas I filled up at which gas station. But I do care if some official or computer program decides that enough is enough because the earth will burn if I exceed the number of miles per month I drive with an internal combustion engine. False pretenses have always been used to restrict hard-won freedoms. The freedom to breathe freely was also taken away from us, fortunately “only” for two years.
Author of the article: Marek Wojcik
Email: worldscam3@gmail.com
<If you like what I write, it would help a lot to further spread these articles if you share them with your friends on social media.